Life in Former Soviet States: What Are They Like
Today?
|
I have taught World History for several years now. A challenge that frequently arises in my classes centers on the students being unable to grasp the key differences in todayÕs Russian economic and political activities. In my class, we end our class with a unit called, ÒRussia Today.Ó We look at the collapse of the Soviet Union and the factors contributing to the collapse. By doing this, we attempt to understand how the current situation in Russia arose and recognize why the study of Russia is relevant to the students today. After this unit, we jump back to the beginning of Russian History and follow the normal sequence. This opening unit also allows the students more easily to understand current events, and we require a weekly current events assignment throughout the term. We discuss the current events and determine what factors have contributed to the current situation. One current event that is of great concern to the world community is the current state of RussiaÕs nuclear wastes. Russia and the former republics of the Soviet Union have had a terrible history of nuclear-related mishaps. In spite of this, Russia is proposing that it will now begin accepting nuclear wastes from around the world for long-term storage and reprocessing in Siberia. By doing so, Russia is hoping to earn up to $25 billion in foreign revenues. |
Lesson Author
|
Name: |
Patrick Farley |
|
School: |
East Marshall |
Lesson Audience
|
Grade Level |
High School (Best for 11-12 Grade) |
# of Class Periods |
3-5 |
|
Class |
World History, Ethnic Studies/Cultures |
Length of Period |
50 Minutes |
Objectives Back to Navigation Bar
|
Student will understand: 1. That one of the keys to the success of market-based economies is the right to own, control, and receive the benefits from private property. The existence of clearly defined and well-secured property rights creates incentives for owners to direct their property to its highest valued use. This, of necessity, includes consideration of the value of conserving the resource for future use. It also encourages the owner to ensure that the value of his property doesnÕt deteriorate – for example, through pollution. 2. In market based economies, private ownership confers two types of rights: control rights – the right to control the use of property or transfer the control to someone else, and benefit rights – the right to any value that may be created from the property. For instance, the owner of a home near a large sports stadium can control the use of his property. He decides whether or not other people may park their cars on his lawn, and if he chooses to allow parking during sporting events, he receives the benefits – in the form of money – from using his property in this way. 3. In the former Soviet Union, in theory, the people owned everything because the state owned everything. In reality, control rights and benefits rights were separated. Ministry officials and plant and farm managers exercised control rights. Benefit rights belonged to Òthe people,Ó to everyone, and were to flow to workers through improved standards of living. Both in the factory and on the farm, this situation created a moral hazard – incentives for abuses of power. The government officials and plant and farm managers often used their control to try to create personal benefits. Taking bribes and/or using Òthe peopleÕsÓ resources for their own benefit was endemic, expected, and at least tolerated if not actually condoned by the citizenry. On the other hand there were no incentives to end this corruption. The benefit rights were so diffuse – spread out among so many people, that no one could claim a direct payment from production or farming, and no one was directly responsible for losses. On the Soviet collective, workers had no incentive to work harder; many to most shirked work whenever possible. The result was a heavy emphasis on output with little or no concern for: production costs, or the best uses of land. Another consequence of the Òshared by allÓ property rights was that the Soviet Union experienced problems traditionally known by economists as the Òtragedy of the commons.Ó 4. Economists have long recognized that when Òthe peopleÓ or ÒeveryoneÓ owns something, the incentives are the same as when no one owns it. 5. The peasant drove a tractor that everyone owned, out to till a field that everyone owned, to spread seed and fertilizer that everyone owned, to raise a crop that everyone owned! The problems arising from an individualÕs sense of non-ownership include: -overuse and depletion of farm lands; -deterioration of capital equipment; -pollution and disregard for the total environment. 6. More generally, with private property for each, any change in output from more effort goes to the person extending the extra effort. With common property, the gain is not in the change in output, but the change in output divided by the number in the group. 7. The larger the group, the less the gain from working harder and the less the loss from working less – from the individualÕs perspective. In other words, the larger the group, the greater the incentive to free-ride. In contrast to their approach to the common property, peasants improved their private plots and took care to preserve or build up their fertility. 8. The collective farm household eked out a living, supporting itself by pilfering grain and provisions from the collective farm to feed a milk cow and a few chickens and by selling the produce from its private plot in a nearby town. |
|
|
Materials
Back to Navigation Bar
|
General
|
|
Online Resources (hyperlink)
|
|
Handouts (Handouts embedded in Appendix)
|
Classroom
Procedures Back to Navigation Bar
|
Prior Learning (background information, vocabulary) The student will need to know:
|
|
Day 1-2:
|
|
Day
2-3: Information Group Advantages Group
Disadvantages
Group
*Assign The
Strange Case of Russian Capitalism website for research and discussion the
next day. |
|
Day 3-5 Days 3 into day 4 we take a closer look at modern Russia by discussing The Strange Case of Russian Capitalism website and then exploring a number of different sources on the internet while also watching and taking notes of the PBS documentary Face of Russia. The following concepts are explained to the students and discussed in a large group learning discussion at first. Later we break up into small groups and designate deeper discussion on assigned concepts.
|
|
|
Extension Back to Navigation Bar
Evaluation Back to Navigation Bar
Rubric
The rubric below may be used toÉ..
|
|
Exceptional |
Proficient |
More Effort Needed |
|
|
25 pts |
18 pts |
14 pts |
|
Topicality |
Totally on topic;
all parts of the assignment are fully addressed |
Mostly on topic;
all parts of the assignment are generally addressed OR one aspect of the
assignment is not addressed |
Vaguely or not at
all on topic; many parts of the assignment are not addressed or are only
superficially addressed |
|
|
25 pts |
18 pts |
14 pts |
|
Substance |
Fully developed
ideas with coherent reasoning and/or supporting examples |
Ideas not
completely developed; some sloppy reasoning or poorly selected examples |
Ideas not
developed; lacking sufficient detail to understand the thoughts behind the
words |
|
|
25 pts |
18 pts |
14 pts |
|
Clarity |
Logical
organization of ideas; complete sentences; very few spelling and grammar
errors |
Somewhat logical
sequence of ideas; mostly complete sentences; some spelling and grammar
errors |
Disorganized
thoughts; multiple sentence fragments or spelling and grammar errors that
distract from the ideas being expressed |
Creativity Bonus
– You may earn up to 3 extra credit points for taking an exceptionally
creative approach to the assignment or for being particularly insightful.
Appendix Back to Navigation Bar
Handouts
|
http://history.illinoisstate.edu/tahg/teachers_as_scholars/leffler_cain.html |